China · Framework
China — Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework 3.0
Issued by National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity Standardization of China (TC260).
Summary
China’s Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework 3.0 updates the national reference framework first issued in 2024. Prepared by TC260 under the guidance of the Cyberspace Administration of China, it retains the organising logic of risk classification, technical response and comprehensive governance while revising the risk taxonomy and governance measures for newer AI developments. The framework is not legislation, but it is a significant statement of China’s evolving approach to AI safety, risk prevention and controllability.
Why it matters
Updated AI risk classification; revised technical responses; comprehensive governance mechanisms; emphasis on human-centred development, safety, controllability, consensus-building and risk prevention.
Governance themes
Topics
Record metadata
- Country
- China
- Region
- Asia-Pacific
- Governance themes
- AI governance, Risk management, Safety
- Document type
- Framework
- Status
- Published
- Publication date
- 14 September 2026
- Added to archive
- 9 November 2026
- Archive record last updated
- 9 November 2026
- Language
- English
- Original source
- View original source
Citation export
Plain citation
National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity Standardization of China, Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework 3.0, 14 September 2026. Global AI Governance Archive. https://archive.reitaw.com/documents/china-ai-safety-governance-framework-3-0.
BibTeX
@misc{china_ai_safety_governance_framework_3_0,
title = {China — Artificial Intelligence Safety Governance Framework 3.0},
author = {National Technical Committee 260 on Cybersecurity Standardization of China (TC260)},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Global AI Governance Archive},
url = {https://www.tc260.org.cn/tc260/xwdt1/202609/d513a007d04347f58e483fabaefb34b8.shtml},
note = {Archive record: https://archive.reitaw.com/documents/china-ai-safety-governance-framework-3-0},
}See the citation guide for style-specific examples.
Recorded cross-references
- China — Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services
- Beijing AI Principles
Related Entries
- SingaporeFramework22 January 2026
Singapore — Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI
Singapore’s Model AI Governance Framework for Agentic AI provides organisational guidance for deploying AI agents responsibly. It centres on four dimensions: selecting and bounding appropriate use cases, making humans me…
- European UnionRegulation24 July 2026
European Union — Digital Omnibus on AI Regulation (EU) 2026/1744
Regulation (EU) 2026/1744, the Digital Omnibus on AI, amends the EU AI Act and related product-safety legislation to simplify implementation. It preserves the Act’s general application from 2 August 2026 but defers the p…
- InternationalReport16 September 2026
OECD — Agentic AI in Organisations: Early Insights from Practitioner Interviews
This OECD working paper examines how agentic AI is being developed, deployed and governed in practice. Based on interviews with organisations across regions and sectors, it documents emerging applications, expected benef…
- United StatesGuidance19 August 2026
United States — NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: Quick-Start Guide for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for CSF Analysis and Reporting (NIST SP 1353, Initial Public Draft)
NIST SP 1353 explores how generative AI can support organisations using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. It provides structured prompts and practical use cases for activities including reviewing organisational cyber…
- AustraliaPolicy / Strategy17 January 2024
Australia — Safe and Responsible AI in Australia Government Interim Response
Australia’s government interim response to the Safe and Responsible AI consultation proposed a differentiated approach to AI governance. Rather than adopting a single generic standard, it suggested mandatory safeguards f…
This archive is provided for research and informational purposes. It should not be interpreted as legal or regulatory advice.