United States · Guidance
United States — FTC Enforcement Actions on Algorithmic Disgorgement
Issued by Federal Trade Commission.
Summary
The Federal Trade Commission’s 2026 enforcement focus on algorithmic disgorgement used consumer protection powers to address models trained on illegally obtained, deceptive, or non-consensual data. In such cases, companies may be required to delete not only the underlying data but also trained models built from it. The frontier also expanded toward liability for autonomous software agents performing multi-step tasks such as banking, booking, and administrative work. This approach positioned enforcement, data provenance, and responsibility for agentic harms as central issues in United States AI governance.
Why it matters
Algorithmic disgorgement; deletion of unlawfully obtained data; destruction of models trained on unlawful or deceptive data; consumer protection enforcement; autonomous agent liability; responsibility for deceptive or financially harmful agent actions.
Topics
Record metadata
- Country
- United States
- Region
- Americas
- Organisation
- Federal Trade Commission
- Document type
- Guidance
- Status
- Published
- Publication date
- 1 January 2026
- Last updated
- 27 June 2026
- Language
- English
- Original source
- View original source
Citation export
Plain citation
Federal Trade Commission, Enforcement Actions on Algorithmic Disgorgement, 2026.
BibTeX
@misc{us_ftc_enforcement_actions_algorithmic_disgorgement_2026,
title = {United States — FTC Enforcement Actions on Algorithmic Disgorgement},
author = {Federal Trade Commission},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {Global AI Governance Archive},
url = {https://www.ftc.gov/}
}See the citation guide for style-specific examples.
Recorded cross-references
- United States — Executive Order 14110
- United States — Colorado AI Act SB 24-205
- United States — Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
Related Entries
- United StatesGuidance1 October 2022
United States — Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights was a non-binding United States federal framework for protecting the public from harmful automated systems. Published by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in 2…
- United StatesRegulation1 January 2024
United States — DOJ Title II ADA Rule on Web and Mobile Accessibility
The U.S. Department of Justice Title II ADA web accessibility rule requires state and local government web content and mobile apps to meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA accessibility standards. It is important for AI governance beca…
- United StatesFramework8 February 2024
United States — U.S. AI Safety Institute Consortium
The U.S. AI Safety Institute Consortium was established by NIST in February 2024 to operationalise work flowing from Executive Order 14110. It convened more than 200 organisations, including AI companies, academic instit…
- United StatesGuidance25 April 2023
United States — Joint Statement on Discrimination and Bias in Automated Systems
The joint statement by the EEOC, FTC, DOJ, and CFPB clarified that existing civil rights and consumer protection laws apply to automated systems. It is particularly relevant to AI hiring tools, including resume screeners…
- United StatesOther30 October 2023
United States — Executive Order 14110 on Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy AI
Executive Order 14110 directed a whole-of-government approach to safe, secure, and trustworthy AI in the United States. It required developers of certain dual-use foundation models to share safety test information with t…
This archive is provided for research and informational purposes. It should not be interpreted as legal or regulatory advice.