United States / Colorado · Act / Law
United States — Colorado AI Act SB 24-205 Implementation and Rules
Issued by Colorado General Assembly / Office of the Attorney General.
Summary
Colorado’s AI Act implementation represented a major state-level development in United States AI governance while federal legislation remained stalled. The law established consumer protection duties for developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems. It imposed a duty of care to protect consumers from algorithmic discrimination in contexts such as housing, employment, banking, and insurance. It also required deployers to conduct and document annual algorithmic impact assessments, shifting responsibility toward businesses that use third-party AI tools in consequential decision-making settings.
Why it matters
Broad state-level AI consumer protection law; duty of care for developers and deployers; protections against algorithmic discrimination; high-risk AI coverage in housing, employment, banking, and insurance; annual algorithmic impact assessments.
Topics
Record metadata
- Country
- United States / Colorado
- Region
- Americas
- Document type
- Act / Law
- Status
- In force
- Publication date
- 1 January 2025
- Added to archive
- 27 June 2026
- Archive record last updated
- 27 June 2026
- Language
- English
- Original source
- View original source
Citation export
Plain citation
Colorado General Assembly, Senate Bill 24-205, Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act implementation and rules, 2025. Global AI Governance Archive. https://archive.reitaw.com/documents/colorado-ai-act-sb-24-205-implementation-rules-2025.
BibTeX
@misc{colorado_ai_act_sb_24_205_implementation_rules_2025,
title = {United States — Colorado AI Act SB 24-205 Implementation and Rules},
author = {Colorado General Assembly / Office of the Attorney General},
year = {2025},
howpublished = {Global AI Governance Archive},
url = {https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb24-205},
note = {Archive record: https://archive.reitaw.com/documents/colorado-ai-act-sb-24-205-implementation-rules-2025},
}See the citation guide for style-specific examples.
Recorded cross-references
- United States — Executive Order 14110
- United States — U.S. AI Safety Institute Consortium
- United States — Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
Related Entries
- United StatesGuidance1 October 2022
United States — Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights
The Blueprint for an AI Bill of Rights was a non-binding United States federal framework for protecting the public from harmful automated systems. Published by the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy in 2…
- United StatesGuidance19 August 2026
United States — NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0: Quick-Start Guide for Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) for CSF Analysis and Reporting (NIST SP 1353, Initial Public Draft)
NIST SP 1353 explores how generative AI can support organisations using the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. It provides structured prompts and practical use cases for activities including reviewing organisational cyber…
- United StatesGuidance1 January 2026
United States — FTC Enforcement Actions on Algorithmic Disgorgement
The Federal Trade Commission’s 2026 enforcement focus on algorithmic disgorgement used consumer protection powers to address models trained on illegally obtained, deceptive, or non-consensual data. In such cases, compani…
- ChinaRegulation1 January 2025
China — Updated Enforcement Directives for Deep Synthesis and Generative AI Services
China’s 2025 enforcement directives for deep synthesis and generative AI services intensified implementation of existing generative AI and algorithmic governance rules. The directives focused on advanced watermarking for…
- G20Framework1 January 2025
G20 — Framework on Digital Public Infrastructure and Ethical AI Integration
The G20 framework linked AI governance with Digital Public Infrastructure, reflecting a stronger Global South emphasis in 2025. It framed ethical AI integration as dependent on public digital systems, sovereign capacity,…
This archive is provided for research and informational purposes. It should not be interpreted as legal or regulatory advice.